<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avatar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ultranurd.net/2009/12/24/avatar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ultranurd.net/2009/12/24/avatar/</link>
	<description>Collected Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:36:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Ward</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultranurd.net/2009/12/24/avatar/comment-page-1/#comment-6521</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultranurd.net/?p=761#comment-6521</guid>
		<description>Whoops, I had it in my head that he was econ so I didn&#039;t even think to check. Thanks, Arthur. Fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, I had it in my head that he was econ so I didn&#8217;t even think to check. Thanks, Arthur. Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Barker</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultranurd.net/2009/12/24/avatar/comment-page-1/#comment-6517</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultranurd.net/?p=761#comment-6517</guid>
		<description>And before &quot;Avatar&quot; and &quot;Star Trek&quot; there was Bill Shatner speaking Esperanto, in the horror film called &quot;Incubus&quot;.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F77k6SQX7iQ&amp;feature=related

As an Esperanto speaker I found it terrifying!  His Esperanto pronunciation that is, not the film.

Your readers may be interested in http://www.lernu.net  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And before &#8220;Avatar&#8221; and &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; there was Bill Shatner speaking Esperanto, in the horror film called &#8220;Incubus&#8221;.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F77k6SQX7iQ&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F77k6SQX7iQ&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>As an Esperanto speaker I found it terrifying!  His Esperanto pronunciation that is, not the film.</p>
<p>Your readers may be interested in <a href="http://www.lernu.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.lernu.net</a>  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultranurd.net/2009/12/24/avatar/comment-page-1/#comment-6512</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultranurd.net/?p=761#comment-6512</guid>
		<description>Which one?  Unobtainium or shock-and-awe?  Or shock-and-d&#039;awwww?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which one?  Unobtainium or shock-and-awe?  Or shock-and-d&#8217;awwww?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Ward</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultranurd.net/2009/12/24/avatar/comment-page-1/#comment-6511</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultranurd.net/?p=761#comment-6511</guid>
		<description>I was basing that conclusion in some part on the fact that the audience at the showing I went to groaned at that one.

I hadn&#039;t noticed the articulation on the lemur-things, I&#039;ll have to look for that in my next viewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was basing that conclusion in some part on the fact that the audience at the showing I went to groaned at that one.</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t noticed the articulation on the lemur-things, I&#8217;ll have to look for that in my next viewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultranurd.net/2009/12/24/avatar/comment-page-1/#comment-6510</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 05:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultranurd.net/?p=761#comment-6510</guid>
		<description>I disagree that &quot;unobtainium&quot; is a plausible in-setting name. In real life any magic material would almost certainly be named after some property it had or something it was used for. The &quot;unobtainium&quot; name is something we use for things in fiction that are impossible (hence we can&#039;t obtain them in real life); anything that actually becomes possible becomes by definition not-unobtainium, and would be far more usefully classified and named after something that it actually did or was.

Also, Tim Burke is a history prof, not an econ prof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that &#8220;unobtainium&#8221; is a plausible in-setting name. In real life any magic material would almost certainly be named after some property it had or something it was used for. The &#8220;unobtainium&#8221; name is something we use for things in fiction that are impossible (hence we can&#8217;t obtain them in real life); anything that actually becomes possible becomes by definition not-unobtainium, and would be far more usefully classified and named after something that it actually did or was.</p>
<p>Also, Tim Burke is a history prof, not an econ prof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultranurd.net/2009/12/24/avatar/comment-page-1/#comment-6509</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultranurd.net/?p=761#comment-6509</guid>
		<description>Just two quick observations:

Regarding unobtainium, I actually liked that; it was refreshingly snarky, as well as being a plausible name in-setting.  It was also nice because it was &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; the MacGuffin.  Similarly, regarding &quot;shock and awe&quot;, why wouldn&#039;t that phrase stick around for 150 years?  Both &quot;unobtainium&quot; and &quot;shock and awe&quot; are things we have here and now, and I rather preferred that the movie didn&#039;t do what so much near-future scifi does, and pretend that current vocal would just go away.  Sure, drop current slang, but things like &quot;shock and awe&quot;?  That&#039;s gonna stay.

Regarding Na&#039;vi limbs, the lemurs you see early on go some way to explaining what happened, if not why; their paired forelimbs had fused to the elbow, and they were the most likely nearest-relative to the Na&#039;vi, so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just two quick observations:</p>
<p>Regarding unobtainium, I actually liked that; it was refreshingly snarky, as well as being a plausible name in-setting.  It was also nice because it was <em>not</em> the MacGuffin.  Similarly, regarding &#8220;shock and awe&#8221;, why wouldn&#8217;t that phrase stick around for 150 years?  Both &#8220;unobtainium&#8221; and &#8220;shock and awe&#8221; are things we have here and now, and I rather preferred that the movie didn&#8217;t do what so much near-future scifi does, and pretend that current vocal would just go away.  Sure, drop current slang, but things like &#8220;shock and awe&#8221;?  That&#8217;s gonna stay.</p>
<p>Regarding Na&#8217;vi limbs, the lemurs you see early on go some way to explaining what happened, if not why; their paired forelimbs had fused to the elbow, and they were the most likely nearest-relative to the Na&#8217;vi, so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
